The industrial future of the
Western countries seems surely marked by a strong orientation to
models based primarily on continuous innovation of products and
processes.
Also offers high-level training (University) is moving increasingly in this direction, offering curricula that are "borderline" with "specialized courses" and with the aim of offering human resources "ready to use".
But the signs of something that does not work are many.
What training can 'be considered "ready" for innovative business models?
What are the marketing models that respond better to the changes that have gone in a few decades from a product orientation to market, and in a not too distant future, to the customer?
Arguments too complex to be addressed and simplified in a few lines.
Limited to the first question, I do not think you can ever make human resource "ready" when the market is evolving rapidly and requires continuous innovation of products and processes.
Even professional bodies are reorganizing models "forcing" a training its members, although in my personal opinion represent an organization "outdated" and preserved in some country.
Personally, I have always believed in a "process of innovation within" that must be "primed" during our first "twenty years" of schooling and should have sufficient propulsion least for the "fifty years" after working and "use" intensive.
For us engineers who want to "ride" the future of innovation this "trigger consists of a good base mathematics with its numerous potential available.
Several times I have had the opportunity to meet with experts on these topics and I am convinced that the road to innovation goes right for these environments.
All we can invent is already invented in a global world that provides the information with a speed that is unprecedented in history.
Then, the fundamentals remain but the systemic approach is always more. System Engineer convinced, I believe in mathematical modeling, traditional or "modern" it is, and it is especially with these tools that you will win in the near future innovation.
The product of the future will be designed for an innovative market with the "modeling" mathematical increasingly oriented research and development. The ICT has every chance to grow again moving towards technological innovation, but it needs to get out of simple concepts, geared almost exclusively to compete with the low cost, to follow the way of the systemic innovation.
Also offers high-level training (University) is moving increasingly in this direction, offering curricula that are "borderline" with "specialized courses" and with the aim of offering human resources "ready to use".
But the signs of something that does not work are many.
What training can 'be considered "ready" for innovative business models?
What are the marketing models that respond better to the changes that have gone in a few decades from a product orientation to market, and in a not too distant future, to the customer?
Arguments too complex to be addressed and simplified in a few lines.
Limited to the first question, I do not think you can ever make human resource "ready" when the market is evolving rapidly and requires continuous innovation of products and processes.
Even professional bodies are reorganizing models "forcing" a training its members, although in my personal opinion represent an organization "outdated" and preserved in some country.
Personally, I have always believed in a "process of innovation within" that must be "primed" during our first "twenty years" of schooling and should have sufficient propulsion least for the "fifty years" after working and "use" intensive.
For us engineers who want to "ride" the future of innovation this "trigger consists of a good base mathematics with its numerous potential available.
Several times I have had the opportunity to meet with experts on these topics and I am convinced that the road to innovation goes right for these environments.
All we can invent is already invented in a global world that provides the information with a speed that is unprecedented in history.
Then, the fundamentals remain but the systemic approach is always more. System Engineer convinced, I believe in mathematical modeling, traditional or "modern" it is, and it is especially with these tools that you will win in the near future innovation.
The product of the future will be designed for an innovative market with the "modeling" mathematical increasingly oriented research and development. The ICT has every chance to grow again moving towards technological innovation, but it needs to get out of simple concepts, geared almost exclusively to compete with the low cost, to follow the way of the systemic innovation.
No comments:
Post a Comment